Evidence and editorial policy

New directory entries distinguish provider documentation from editorial inference and hands-on evidence.

Official-source review

We read the linked provider pages and record a review date. This establishes what the provider documents, not an independent product test. Prices may change; billing terms, currencies and usage units must be considered together.

Editorial judgment

Suitability notes are inferences from the documented features and restrictions. Each entry explains its reasoning. Entries are alphabetical, not ranked by quality or payment.

Hands-on evidence

The current directory has no hands-on benchmarks. We do not assign ratings, promise results or claim measured savings. A future test must include the task, conditions, observed result, failure cases and cost record.

Commercial links

Current directory links go directly to official websites without affiliate tracking. Older articles retain their historical disclosures and are separately marked as awaiting re-verification.

Coverage

This is a focused starting set, not a comprehensive market survey. The original unverified seed data is not published as current fact. Hosted free plans are distinguished from cloud trials and self-hosted software.